🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.